Friday, September 7, 2012

The Death and Life of Ordinary American Towns: Part II

Historic Photograph of Hot Springs, New Mexico
http://hotspringsfestival.com/historic_hot_springs.html




The intention to write about the town planning meeting that took place on August 24-25th, 2012, will be thwarted for a day or two. Late as it already is, there are a few more background notes on historic preservation, planning and revitalization to add. A review of the charrette will follow in the next post. A comment made by Charlie Deans, New Mexico Main Street Design Associate and meeting facilitator sparked this post. Charlie said that the space where the now-demolished Youth Center and former Senior Center once stood was both literally and figuratively the heart of Truth or Consequences. The heart of Hot Springs.  


Hearts are a powerful metaphor because they speak to basic needs like blood and air, but they are also used to speak to other essential needs like love, companionship and relationships. The conversation I was reminded of when the “heart of town” was evoked was about the demolition of the Albuquerque Alvarado Hotel. A writer in the local free newspaper, The Alibi, likened the demolition to stopping the beating heart of the city. The heart of any city, even a still heart, is downtown. This is how American colonial town and cities, first built or booming, were arranged. A center place is evident across culture, time and place. It is where communities come together to discuss our shared trial and tribulations. No matter how deserted or run down, no matter how built up or sprawled out a city becomes, the heart remains in downtown. 

 I wrote about Albuquerque’s downtown revitalization while taking my first course in the Historic Preservation and Regionalism certificate program in UNM's School of Architecture. The executive director of the Albuquerque Downtown Action Team, the organization that heads the revitalization efforts, emphatically insisted that places cannot exist without a heart, any more than a foot can exist on its own.  I was reminded of Plato's body politic, a metaphor of body and function loved by Greeks and others throughout the ages. Heart and head and hands and arms, from the single body to the teeming metropolis, all are connected and dependent but recognizable in parts. The summer before, in a cultural landscape documentation course, former Santa Fe County planner and cultural landscape visionary Arnie Valdez likened an acequia to the heart of a community, with arteries sending the lifeblood of water to grow food, but also to grow families and communities. 


View of Santa Fe Plaza in the 1850's, ca. 1930
Gerald Cassidy (1869-1934)
  
Albuquerque Uptown, with its pretend chaco-canyon masonry and its pretend second story businesses, and its pedestrian-friendly business-block model that draws shoppers is a hip place to shop, but it is merely a facade of what eary and mid-century American downtown's looked like. It is thriving, but it is "Up" town,  and ultimately little more than an outdoor shopping mall. No matter where you live or go in Albuquerque, be it an "old" town neighborhood, south valley or suburb, Midtown or the Heights, places in a city are defined by their relation to downtown.  When hearts stop beating, even figurative or symbolic hearts like downtown or community ditches, other things die too.

The Death and Life of Ordinary American Towns: Part I post explored some of the history of the destruction wrought by plans that were going to "save" economically depressed downtown's carried out in the 1960s and 1970s.The title is a take on the iconic planning text written by Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961). Jacobs bashed the government-led destruction of the historic built environments of downtown's across America, and the replacement of vibrant diverse communities with sterile efforts at “rational” planning that were miserable failures. Race and class were always at play, although these elements, like today, were mostly obscured by rhetoric of development. 

In the 1960s however, the good forces in federal government (you know the good forces, the level-headed, thoughtful, largely accountable and transparent folks who strive to make government work for people because the government is the people? no? anyway...) got together to protect America's historic buildings and archeological sites. Early preservation efforts were very nationalistic, which meant that issues of who and what counts as historic, iconic or important were pretty narrow. But preservation has always been local and grassroots, and remains that way. The passage of national legislation was a big step in giving communities the tools to make preservation happen locally.

Historic preservation happens when people and communities protect and preserve places. These are buildings, districts, cultural landscapes, artifacts or other things, like stories or views or traditions, which reflect elements of our shared cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological or architectural history. Preservation strengthens local economies, increases economic and environmental sustainability, fosters beauty and community pride, promotes history, and makes stronger communities. Historic resources are defined as districts, sites, structures, objects or buildings that are greater than seventy-five years in age, and are significant in local, state or national history, architecture, archeology, engineering, or culture. History encompasses all cultures, all economic classes, and all of the cultural,  social, political and private activities that form the background to the present. It is our job to make that history visible, the happy, hard, easy, brutal, generous, hard times and good times history visible  in our communities so it can inform us. I am obviously a convert, but for good reason.

Drawing from the National Park Service Santa Fe Trail Comprehensive Plan
 
The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) is meant, according to preservation scholar Dr. Robin Elizabeth Datel, to retain diverse elements of past, to perpetuate the distinctive identities of places, to involve people in preservation, and to promote conservation. It does not, contrary to popular belief by the less-than-level-headed, give government the right to control private property or tell property owners what to do. Only local governments can impose restrictions, and these are rarely too onerous. They are also generally welcome. Properties in officially designated historic districts and neighborhoods tend to hold their value much better than other properties, and people pay more to live and retail in these areas because of aesthetic and other regulations. Santa Fe has one of the oldest local oversight boards, and their property values and tourist industry are pretty good.

The Passage of the The National Historic Preservation Act created the National Register of Historic Places, the list of National Historic Landmarks, and State Historic Preservation Offices. The New Mexico Historic Preservation Division (http://www.nmhistoricpreservation.org) "identifies and protects New Mexico's cultural resources, including its archaeological sites, architectural and engineering achievements, cultural landscapes and diverse heritage. We help communities identify, evaluate, preserve, and revitalize their historic, archaeological, and cultural resources. Preservation happens locally. It is site specific—your building, your block, your town, your landscape. It is built on partnerships. … access to the information you need to help preserve New Mexico's diverse cultural heritage, encourage community revitalization through re-use of existing buildings and enhance heritage tourism opportunities." 

Preservation at Work in Truth or Consequences
 
New Mexico MainStreet Program (http://nmmainstreet.org) is a “grassroots economic development program that assists communities in revitalizing their traditional commercial neighborhoods.  A program of the New Mexico Economic Development Department, MainStreet works throughout New Mexico to help affiliated downtown organizations create an economically viable business environment while preserving local cultural and historic resources.”  Truth or Consequences is a MainStreet community in New Mexico. The national main Street organization has a terrific page on the National Trust for Historic Preservation website (http://www.preservationnation.org) that talks about how and why Main Streets matter to local sustainability, and why historic preservation is key economic revitalization in downtown areas. A vibrant downtown keeps the rest of the town and city, from the big box retail areas where Wal-Mart and Walgreens are, to the neighborhoods where we live, sustainable and vibrant. We need all of our parts working if the whole is going to thrive.

Preservation is not about museums and old buildings, although it can be. It is really about making sure we take the time to create places that matter. Powerful places tell us who we are, and where we came from, and where we are going. All of our town’s should be places that matter, and should be powerful places. And that is what people are trying to do with preservation and economic development, with Rotary Clubs and RC & D councils. There is a lot to learn. Everything here was new to me a few years ago. But it brought me to Truth or Consequences, because I am curious about what is going on in this place. It is a place that matters to me. A little more every week. There were some very interesting things that went on at the town planning meeting a few weeks ago. I will write about it with haste, and soon!

http://newgraffiti3dwallpaper.blogspot.com


The heart of the town, after all, is at stake. 





No comments:

Post a Comment